at the type of “interaction” we can do during “interactive workshops” ….
Aren’t they constrained and narrowed to exchange ideas in a particular, expected way?
And we call that engagement, as that is what we are used to.
But what if there are better ways.
In some of those “interative workshops”, when people walk out, nothing really changes.
Because the real challenge isn’t awareness.
It’s decision-making when you have to, and under pressure.
That’s where most teams struggle.
So we flipped the model.
No long presentations.
No passive learning.
Just real-world scenarios where teams have to:
– Make decisions
– Deal with trade-offs
– Defend their thinking
– See the consequences
It’s messy.
It’s uncomfortable.
And that’s exactly why it works.
If learning doesn’t change how decisions are made, what’s the point?
